Revenue Leadership Strategy
CRO vs CGO:
Which One Does
Your Company Need?
Most companies hire a CRO when they actually need a CGO. The distinction is not just a title. It determines whether the revenue problem gets fixed at the execution layer or at the architecture layer.
The Core Difference
What CROs and CGOs Actually Do
Chief Revenue Officer
Owns the number, the pipeline, and the team
The CRO optimizes a go-to-market system that already exists. They run the forecast, manage the VP of Sales, set quotas, and drive execution. They are experts at making a functioning revenue machine run better.
Chief Growth Officer
Owns the model, the market, and the architecture
The CGO asks whether the go-to-market system itself is built for the right buyer in the right market. They address positioning, pricing strategy, business model evolution, and the transition from one growth phase to the next.
When You Need a CRO
Your go-to-market architecture is sound but execution is broken
Pipeline stages are undefined. Forecast methodology is optimistic. Rep performance is inconsistent. If the system is right but the execution is wrong, a CRO fixes it.
When You Need a CGO
Your go-to-market architecture is built for a market that no longer exists
Sales motion designed for the wrong buyer. Pricing model facing AI-driven commoditization. Revenue growth that has stalled despite good execution. If the system itself is wrong, a CRO cannot fix it.
The Inversion GTM Approach
Playing Both Roles
Kevin French serves as Fractional CRO & CGO - playing both roles because most technology services companies need both. The CRO work (forecast, pipeline, team) and the CGO work (architecture, positioning, model evolution) cannot be separated when the go-to-market needs to be rebuilt from the foundation.
Ready to Talk?
If this resonates, start with the Growth Audit. A 48-72 hour deep dive that maps exactly where your revenue is leaking.
$2,500-$3,500 - No obligation to continue
Inversion